Legislator Case Law & Legislation
SK 05 142 • KG LU SK 05 142 AI generated

Creditor v. Debtor (Website Listing Liquidated Damages)

Case Number SK 05 142
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a debt collection matter where a creditor sought enforcement based on a written contract acknowledging debt for a website listing, the dispute concerned the extent to which a contractually agreed-upon liquidated damage clause (stipulated at 70% of the net price upon early termination) served as a provisional title for legal authorization. The court reasoned that the debt enforcement judge must summarily determine the permissible amount of a penalty or liquidated damage sum in the authorization procedure pursuant to relevant articles of the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Act and the Code of Obligations; finding that the lower court's reduction of the liquidated damages to 15% of the net price was appropriate because, given the immediate cancellation just one business day after signing, this amount reasonably covered initial administrative costs while preventing compensation for work not yet performed, aligning with the principle that excessively high penalties must be judicially moderated.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 82 SchKG; Art. 163 Abs. 3 OR. Der Rechtsöffnungsrichter hat im Rechtsöffnungsverfahren die zulässige Höhe einer Konventionalstrafe oder einer Schadenspauschale auf summarische Weise festzulegen und hierfür Rechtsöffnung zu erteilen. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Keywords

AI generated
debt enforcement termination of contract damage to credit matter in dispute jurisdiction over consumer contracts bankruptcy claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 82 SchKG

Cited as the basis for granting provisional enforcement (Rechtsöffnung) based on the written recognition of debt.

Art. 163 Abs. 3 OR

Cited as the legal basis allowing the judge in the enforcement proceedings to summarily determine and reduce an excessively high penalty clause or fixed damages amount.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 18.01.2006

Fallnummer: · SK 05 142

LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 50

Leitsatz: · Art. 82 SchKG; Art. 163 Abs. 3 OR. Der Rechtsöffnungsrichter hat im Rechtsöffnungsverfahren die zulässige Höhe einer Konventionalstrafe oder einer Schadenspauschale auf summarische Weise festzulegen und hierfür Rechtsöffnung zu erteilen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.