Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SK 03 19 • KG LU SK 03 19 AI generated

Dividend Deposit Dismissal Due to Missed Statutory Filing Deadline

Case Number SK 03 19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court affirmed the dismissal of a request to order the deposit of a dividend share related to a disputed claim in a debt restructuring agreement because the claimant failed to meet the statutory deadline for filing a lawsuit according to the relevant law. The commission determined that the 20-day deadline, which expired on November 11th, was not preserved by filing a conciliation attempt with the justice of the peace, as the applicable cantonal procedural law explicitly excludes a conciliation attempt when a judicial deadline for filing a claim has been set, rendering the subsequent request for deposit under the relevant statute inapplicable.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 315 SchKG; § 186 Abs. 1 lit. a ZPO. Die Frist zur Einreichung der Klage für bestrittene Forderungen ist mit einem Aussöhnungsversuch nicht gewahrt. Wird die Klagefrist nach Abs. 1 nicht eingehalten, entfällt ein Anspruch auf Hinterlegung nach Abs. 2. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Keywords

AI generated
missed deadline filing of a claim disputed claim contract of deposit late notice of dismissal cancellation of securities

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 315 SchKG
The court based its final order on the failure to adhere to the deadline set by this provision for suing on a contested claim.
Art. 306 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 SchKG
Art. 315 Abs. 1 SchKG
Leitsatz: · Art. 315 SchKG; § 186 Abs.
Art. 315 Abs. 2 SchKG
The court determined that the claim for deposit would lapse because the deadline under Art. 315 Abs. 1 SchKG was not met.
Art. 31 Abs. 3 SchKG
Leitsatz: · Art. 315 SchKG; § 186 Abs.
Art. 39 GestG
Art. 343 aOR
Art. 343 Abs. 1 aOR

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 111 II 194
BGE 68 III 90
AI generated
OG 1996 22
Failure to Timely Deposit Court Costs Warrants Dismissal of Appeal
A 96 249
Forfeiture of Premium Subsidies Due to Missed Statutory Deadline
1B 15 3
Late Claim Amendment After Close of Pleadings Upheld
OG 1995 45
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Despite Erroneous Notification
11 98 38
Failure to Collect Registered Decision Warrants Denial of Extension

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 315 SchKG

The court based its final order on the failure to adhere to the deadline set by this provision for suing on a contested claim.

Art. 315 Abs. 2 SchKG

The court determined that the claim for deposit would lapse because the deadline under Art. 315 Abs. 1 SchKG was not met.

§ 186 Abs. 1 lit. a ZPO

The court used this provision to establish that a conciliation attempt is excluded when a deadline for filing a lawsuit has been set by the court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 21.02.2003

Fallnummer: · SK 03 19

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 58

Leitsatz: · Art. 315 SchKG; § 186 Abs. 1 lit. a ZPO. Die Frist zur Einreichung der Klage für bestrittene Forderungen ist mit einem Aussöhnungsversuch nicht gewahrt. Wird die Klagefrist nach Abs. 1 nicht eingehalten, entfällt ein Anspruch auf Hinterlegung nach Abs. 2.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.