Legislator Case Law & Legislation
SK 02 163 • KG LU SK 02 163 AI generated

Child Support Termination Age of Majority Transitional Provisions Self-Sufficiency Review

Case Number SK 02 163
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal concerned a father who ceased child support payments after the child reached the age of 18 and completed vocational training, despite a prior court order establishing support obligations before the law lowered the age of majority. The commission confirmed prior jurisprudence holding that the judge granting definitive enforcement (Rechtsöffnungsrichter) is competent to review the substantive requirements of the provision allowing a parent to cease support if the child can reasonably support themselves (Art. 276 Abs. 3 ZGB), but this review is limited to documentary evidence regarding the child's ability to meet their own needs post-majority age. Furthermore, applying the transitional provision (Art. 13c SchlT ZGB), the court reasoned that since the support obligation was established under the old law setting the age of majority at 20, the obligation presumptively continued until the child turned 20, unless the paying parent had successfully sought an alteration based on the child's ability to be self-sufficient, which was not proven here.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 81 Abs. 1 SchKG; Art. 276 Abs. 3 ZGB; Art. 13c SchlT ZGB. Kompetenz des Rechtsöffnungsrichters zur Überprüfung der sachlichen Voraussetzungen von Art. 276 Abs. 3 ZGB (Bestätigung der Rechtsprechung). Dauer einer altrechtlich - Mündigkeitsalter 20 Jahre - festgelegten Unterhaltsverpflichtung des Vaters gegenüber seinem Kind. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Keywords

AI generated
child support age of majority age of child transitional provisions continuing obligation parental authority

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 81 Abs. 1 SchKG

Cited in the context of the debtor's objections which the court must review in specific cases in summary proceedings.

Art. 276 Abs. 3 ZGB

Cited as the standard according to which the judge in summary proceedings examines whether the child can cover their own maintenance costs.

Art. 13c SchlT ZGB

Cited to establish the duration of the father's maintenance obligation until the child reaches the age of 20, subject to Art. 276 para. 3 CC.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 05.02.2003

Fallnummer: · SK 02 163

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 53

Leitsatz: · Art. 81 Abs. 1 SchKG; Art. 276 Abs. 3 ZGB; Art. 13c SchlT ZGB. Kompetenz des Rechtsöffnungsrichters zur Überprüfung der sachlichen Voraussetzungen von Art. 276 Abs. 3 ZGB (Bestätigung der Rechtsprechung). Dauer einer altrechtlich - Mündigkeitsalter 20 Jahre - festgelegten Unterhaltsverpflichtung des Vaters gegenüber seinem Kind.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.