Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
SK 02 150 • KG LU SK 02 150 AI generated

Affirmation of Deposit Order Following Judicial Confirmation of Composition Agreement

Case Number SK 02 150
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court affirmed the decision to order the deposit of a disputed debt amount following the judicial confirmation of an extrajudicial composition agreement, addressing the creditor's subsequent request for this measure. The Commission reasoned that the authority to order the deposit pursuant to Article 315 (2) of the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law remains with the body that confirmed the agreement, and this order is not mandatorily tied to the initial setting of the deadline for filing suit under Article 315 (1); moreover, a deposit should only be waived if the complete or even partial success of the creditor's ensuing lawsuit is deemed impossible or highly improbable by the composition judge, requiring a higher threshold for denial than for initial security measures.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 315 Abs. 2 SchKG. Aktivlegitimation. Die Hinterlegung kann auch nach der gerichtlichen Bestätigung des Nachlassvertrages angeordnet werden. Auf sie ist nur zu verzichten, wenn die gänzliche oder auch nur teilweise Klagegutheissung nach dem Ermessen des Nachlassrichters ausgeschlossen oder zumindest sehr unwahrscheinlich ist. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Keywords

AI generated
composition in bankruptcy extrajudicial composition agreement request for debt enforcement judicial law contract of deposit partial decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 315 Abs. 2 SchKG
This article forms the central legal basis for the commission's decision to grant the request for the creditor to deposit the disputed claim amount.
Art. 315 Abs. 1 SchKG
Leitsatz: · Art. 315 Abs.
Art. 315 SchKG
Leitsatz: · Art. 315 Abs.
Art. 313 aSchKG
Art. 306 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 SchKG
AI generated
SK 07 118 2
Composition Agreement Approval Upheld Against Creditor Appeal
11 98 91
Debtor's Right to Judicial Deposit Amidst Conflicting Claims and Appealability of Denial
OG 1994 51
Composition Agreement Stay Criteria and Confirmation Standards
SK 07 118 1
Composition Agreement Approval Challenged Over Creditor Claim Classification
SK 00 136
Affirmation of Provisional Legal Title Based on Debt Acknowledgment Despite Duress Claim Regarding Threat of Criminal Complaint

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 315 Abs. 2 SchKG

This article forms the central legal basis for the commission's decision to grant the request for the creditor to deposit the disputed claim amount.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 11.02.2003

Fallnummer: · SK 02 150

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 59

Leitsatz: · Art. 315 Abs. 2 SchKG. Aktivlegitimation. Die Hinterlegung kann auch nach der gerichtlichen Bestätigung des Nachlassvertrages angeordnet werden. Auf sie ist nur zu verzichten, wenn die gänzliche oder auch nur teilweise Klagegutheissung nach dem Ermessen des Nachlassrichters ausgeschlossen oder zumindest sehr unwahrscheinlich ist.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.