Legislator Case Law & Legislation
JK 09 15 • KG LU JK 09 15 AI generated

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Substantiate Financial Need for Legal Aid

Case Number JK 09 15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed an appeal against the denial of free legal aid because the appellant, despite being subject to a comprehensive duty to disclose and substantiate their current financial situation, failed to meet this obligation, even after being requested in the appeal proceedings to submit current financial documentation like recent tax returns or financial statements, instead offering only unsubstantiated claims regarding their assets and liabilities. The court reasoned that while the principle of official investigation applies in free legal aid proceedings, the applicant must fully cooperate by providing verifiable details of income, assets, and obligations; non-compliance with this mandatory disclosure, especially when financial circumstances are complex, justifies the rejection of the application for lack of substantiation regarding indigence.

Legislator headnote

Official

§ 130 ZPO. Untersuchungsgrundsatz und Mitwirkungspflicht im Verfahren um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege. Abweisung eines Gesuches wegen fehlender Mitwirkung der Gesuchstellerin. | Zivilprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
legal aid proceedings financial circumstances legal duty of disclosure failure to provide evidence termination of social assistance indigence

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 125 IV 164
5P.73/2005
Father's Appeal Against Child Support Denial of Legal Aid Upheld
BGE 120 Ia 181
5P.467/1997
6P.52/1999
6S.208/1999
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 130 ZPO

This article governs the granting of free legal aid, and the appeal regarding free legal aid was dismissed due to the applicant's failure to cooperate, which falls under the scope of this provision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Justizkommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 16.09.2009

Fallnummer: · JK 09 15

LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 34

Leitsatz: · § 130 ZPO. Untersuchungsgrundsatz und Mitwirkungspflicht im Verfahren um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege. Abweisung eines Gesuches wegen fehlender Mitwirkung der Gesuchstellerin.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.