Legislator Case Law & Legislation
JK 05 9 1 • KG LU JK 05 9 1 AI generated

Land Registry Transfer Rejection Due to Missing Commercial Register Extract

Case Number JK 05 9 1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case concerns the rejection by the land registry office of an application to record the transfer of an agricultural business, spanning property in two cantons, under the Merger Act, which also involved the establishment of a lifelong right of residence and a right of first refusal. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that while the Merger Act permits a single public document for the transfer of land located across different cantons, the applicant failed to provide the required certified extract from the Commercial Register as mandated by the Cantonal Land Registry Ordinance to prove the transfer of ownership, rendering the registration inadmissible despite the simplified procedure offered by the Merger Act for such transfers.

Legislator headnote

Official

§ 3 Abs. 2 BeurkG; Art. 18a Abs. 1 lit. f GBV; Art. 70 Abs. 2 FusG. Für die Übertragung von Grundstücken nach FusG in verschiedenen Kantonen genügt eine einzige öffentliche Urkunde. | Beurkundungsrecht

Keywords

AI generated
commercial register transfer of property application and registration procedure agricultural land right of residence missing case documents

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 125 IV 81
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 70 Abs. 2 FusG

This provision is explicitly mentioned in the decision's summary/heading which states the main finding regarding the sufficiency of a single public deed for cross-cantonal property transfers under the Merger Act (FusG).

Art. 18a Abs. 1 lit. f GBV

This provision, requiring a certified extract from the commercial register, is cited in the reasoning that leads to the ultimate confirmation of the refusal to register the transfer.

Art. 966 ZGB

This provision is cited in the final sentence of the substantive reasoning section to justify that the registration refusal was ultimately lawful.

Art. 24 Abs. 1 GBV

This provision is cited in the final sentence of the substantive reasoning section to justify that the registration refusal was ultimately lawful.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Justizkommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Beurkundungsrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 02.06.2005

Fallnummer: · JK 05 9.1

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 26

Leitsatz: · § 3 Abs. 2 BeurkG; Art. 18a Abs. 1 lit. f GBV; Art. 70 Abs. 2 FusG. Für die Übertragung von Grundstücken nach FusG in verschiedenen Kantonen genügt eine einzige öffentliche Urkunde.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.