Legislator Case Law & Legislation
JK 05 32 • KG LU JK 05 32 AI generated

Parentage Challenge: Denial of Appointed Counsel

Case Number JK 05 32
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court reviewed whether a plaintiff challenging a legal parent-child relationship was entitled to an appointed legal aid counsel under $\S 135$ Para. 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court reasoned that appointment of counsel depends on the complexity of the legal issues, the litigant's legal knowledge, and whether the opposing party is represented; furthermore, a degree of restraint is warranted when primarily financial interests are at stake. Given that the necessary forms for contesting a parentage claim are readily available online and that such cases often hinge on medical evidence, the court found no indication that the plaintiff faced complex factual or legal questions requiring professional assistance, especially since the opposing parties were also unrepresented, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Legislator headnote

Official

§ 135 Abs. 1 ZPO. Grundsätzlich keine Beigabe eines unentgeltlichen Rechtsbeistandes für die Anfechtung eines Kindesverhältnisses. | Zivilprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
court-appointed legal counsel appointment procedure legal aid Civil Procedure Code parent-child relationship action to contest paternity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 135 Abs. 1 ZPO

This provision regulated the requirement for granting legal counsel and was the basis for rejecting the request for free legal aid.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Justizkommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 16.08.2005

Fallnummer: · JK 05 32

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 36

Leitsatz: · § 135 Abs. 1 ZPO. Grundsätzlich keine Beigabe eines unentgeltlichen Rechtsbeistandes für die Anfechtung eines Kindesverhältnisses.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.