Legislator Case Law & Legislation
3H 11 19 • KG LU 3H 11 19 AI generated

Guardianship Representative Standing to Appeal Supervisory Decision on Asset Management

Case Number 3H 11 19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed the standing of a legal representative to appeal a decision by the guardianship authority concerning the asset management of a person under care, specifically where a higher supervisory authority had overturned the original guardianship decision. The court reasoned that the guardianship authority itself lacks standing to appeal decisions from the lower supervisory authority unless costs imposed upon it are concerned, leading to the dismissal of its appeal. Conversely, a legal representative is entitled to appeal a guardianship authority's decision if the appeal safeguards the interests of the person under care or directly affects the representative's own rights; in this case, because the supervisory authority questioned the representative's fulfillment of their duty to consult third parties regarding asset management, the representative was deemed legitimate to appeal due to the direct impact on their official conduct.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 420 ZGB. Der Mandatsträger kann gegen den Entscheid der Vormundschaftsbehörde Beschwerde führen, soweit er damit entweder Mündelinteressen wahrt oder der angefochtene Entscheid ihn in seinen eigenen Rechten trifft. Demgegenüber ist die Vormundschaftsbehörde selber grundsätzlich ausschliesslich Vorinstanz, wenn es um die Entscheide der unteren Aufsichtsbehörde geht. | Zivilrecht

Keywords

AI generated
guardianship supervisory authority standing to appeal asset management duty of care legal opinion legal representation

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 420 ZGB

Cited in the introductory summary to define the scope of the mandate holder's right to appeal against the decision of the guardianship authority.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · 3. Abteilung

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 08.02.2012

Fallnummer: · 3H 11 19

LGVE: · 2012 I Nr. 10

Leitsatz: · Art. 420 ZGB. Der Mandatsträger kann gegen den Entscheid der Vormundschaftsbehörde Beschwerde führen, soweit er damit entweder Mündelinteressen wahrt oder der angefochtene Entscheid ihn in seinen eigenen Rechten trifft. Demgegenüber ist die Vormundschaftsbehörde selber grundsätzlich ausschliesslich Vorinstanz, wenn es um die Entscheide der unteren Aufsichtsbehörde geht.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.