Legislator Case Law & Legislation
3C 12 1 • KG LU 3C 12 1 AI generated

Global vs. Individual Subsistence Calculation for Legal Aid with Minor Children

Case Number 3C 12 1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed whether, when calculating the necessary subsistence level for legal aid (Unentgeltliche Rechtspflege, UR) for an applicant living with minor children, a global calculation incorporating child support payments and allowances as income should be used. The court affirmed its prior practice of generally employing a global calculation, reasoning that the included income (child support/allowances) is typically lower than the necessary expenses deemed attributable to the child (basic needs, housing contribution, insurance, etc.), thereby balancing the equation. However, the court qualified this by stating that this practice must yield to individual cases where a global calculation would unfairly use mandated child support funds to cover the applicant's own legal costs, as child support constitutes earmarked funds; thus, in such instances, an individual calculation for the applicant is required to comply with federal jurisprudence.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 117 ZPO. Unentgeltliche Rechtspflege. Bei der Berechnung des zivilprozessualen Notbedarfs eines UR-Gesuchstellers, der mit unmündigen Kindern zusammenlebt, ist grundsätzlich eine Gesamtberechnung vorzunehmen. In Einzelfällen kann davon abgewichen werden. | Zivilprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
calculation of child support child allowances legal aid costs minor child living expenses allowances and expenses

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 117 ZPO
The court used this article regarding the granting of free legal aid in its final reasoning regarding the calculation method.
Art. 319 Abs. 1 ZGB
LGVE 1998 I Nr. 29
This prior local decision regarding the calculation of financial needs for applicants for free legal aid was applied in the final decision concerning the departure from the standard comprehensive calculation.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 117 ZPO

The court used this article regarding the granting of free legal aid in its final reasoning regarding the calculation method.

LGVE 1998 I Nr. 29

This prior local decision regarding the calculation of financial needs for applicants for free legal aid was applied in the final decision concerning the departure from the standard comprehensive calculation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · 3. Abteilung

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 14.02.2012

Fallnummer: · 3C 12 1

LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 29

Leitsatz: · Art. 117 ZPO. Unentgeltliche Rechtspflege. Bei der Berechnung des zivilprozessualen Notbedarfs eines UR-Gesuchstellers, der mit unmündigen Kindern zusammenlebt, ist grundsätzlich eine Gesamtberechnung vorzunehmen. In Einzelfällen kann davon abgewichen werden.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.