Legislator Case Law & Legislation
30 09 18 • KG LU 30 09 18 AI generated

Guardianship Authority Obligation in Contested Assistant Appointment

Case Number 30 09 18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a dispute between unmarried parents regarding the appointment of a guardian or assistant for their child following the establishment of an upbringing assistance measure, the higher court overturned the decision of the higher administrative authority that had substituted the initial appointment. The court reasoned that when the parents propose different candidates for the assistant role, the guardianship authority is legally obligated, according to relevant civil code articles, to appoint an independent and neutral person, as the role requires a neutral third party to mediate visitation issues, and it is not proper for a supervisory authority to make the new appointment directly upon finding error, but rather to refer the matter back to the initial authority for a fresh selection.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 379 Abs. 1, 381 und 397 ZGB. Weichen die Vorschläge der Eltern in Bezug auf die Wahl des Vormunds bzw. Beistands voneinander ab, hat die Vormundschaftsbehörde eine unabhängige, neutrale Person zu ernennen. | Familienrecht

Keywords

AI generated
appointment of guardian administrative authority matter in dispute unmarried persons parental responsibility accessory obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 379 Abs. 1 ZGB

Cited in the decision's operative part concerning the authority's duty to choose a suitable guardian/assistant.

Art. 381 ZGB

Cited in the decision's operative part regarding respecting parental suggestions for the appointment.

Art. 397 ZGB

Cited in the decision's operative part as a cross-reference related to the appointment process.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 03.12.2009

Fallnummer: · 30 09 18

LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 5

Leitsatz: · Art. 379 Abs. 1, 381 und 397 ZGB. Weichen die Vorschläge der Eltern in Bezug auf die Wahl des Vormunds bzw. Beistands voneinander ab, hat die Vormundschaftsbehörde eine unabhängige, neutrale Person zu ernennen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.