Kosovan Adoption Decree Refused Recognition Due to Violation of Swiss Public Policy
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the challenge to a lower authority's refusal to recognize a foreign adoption decree involving Kosovan nationals, one of whom was also a Swiss citizen, on the grounds that the decree violated Swiss "ordre public" according to Articles 25 lit. c and 27 Abs. 1 IPRG. The court reasoned that recognition was inappropriate because the adoptive parent was only ten years older than the adopted child, failing the Swiss minimum age difference requirement of more than five years, and because the adoption did not serve the child's best interests, given the child's advanced age (nearly 17.5 at the time of decision), his significant school absences and social issues in his home country, and the questionable benefit of integrating him into a new family and culture so close to his legal majority.
Legislator headnote
OfficialArt. 25 lit. c und 27 Abs. 1 IPRG. Ordre public-Widrigkeit eines ausländischen Adoptionsentscheids, bei welchem der nach schweizerischem Recht erforderliche Mindestaltersunterschied um mehr als fünf Jahre nicht erfüllt und die Voraussetzung des Kindeswohls nicht gegeben ist. | Familienrecht
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited as a basis for the rejection of the appeal due to violation of the Swiss ordre public concerning the lack of required age difference.
Cited as a basis for the rejection of the appeal due to violation of the Swiss ordre public concerning the best interest of the child.
Full text
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · II. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht
Entscheiddatum: · 24.11.2008
Fallnummer: · 30 08 19
LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 18
Leitsatz: · Art. 25 lit. c und 27 Abs. 1 IPRG. Ordre public-Widrigkeit eines ausländischen Adoptionsentscheids, bei welchem der nach schweizerischem Recht erforderliche Mindestaltersunterschied um mehr als fünf Jahre nicht erfüllt und die Voraussetzung des Kindeswohls nicht gegeben ist.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.