Legislator Case Law & Legislation
30 05 9 • KG LU 30 05 9 AI generated

Appeal Dismissed: Repeated FFE Release Requests Without New Facts

Case Number 30 05 9
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed an appeal against a decision not to proceed with a challenge to the continuation of a person's protective custody (FFE), reasoning that while the right to request release from FFE is available at any time under the principle of good faith, repeated requests made at unreasonable intervals without presenting new facts warrant dismissal due to a lack of interest in legal protection. The initial protective custody and its continuation had been thoroughly examined in prior, recent decisions, and the appellant failed to demonstrate any changed circumstances that would justify an immediate review, making the lower court's refusal to rule on the merits appropriate.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 397d Abs. 2 ZGB. Die Einreichung von aufeinander folgenden Entlassungsgesuchen aus der fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) steht unter dem Vorbehalt des Handelns nach Treu und Glauben. | Familienrecht

Keywords

AI generated
immediate dismissal appealability of remand decision failure to provide evidence changed circumstances judicial review legal protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 397d Abs. 2 ZGB

Cited in the reasoning section as the legal basis allowing repeated appeals regarding release from compulsory treatment, which informs the context of the case's procedural history.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 18.07.2005

Fallnummer: · 30 05 9

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 12

Leitsatz: · Art. 397d Abs. 2 ZGB. Die Einreichung von aufeinander folgenden Entlassungsgesuchen aus der fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) steht unter dem Vorbehalt des Handelns nach Treu und Glauben.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.