Appeal Dismissed: Repeated FFE Release Requests Without New Facts
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed an appeal against a decision not to proceed with a challenge to the continuation of a person's protective custody (FFE), reasoning that while the right to request release from FFE is available at any time under the principle of good faith, repeated requests made at unreasonable intervals without presenting new facts warrant dismissal due to a lack of interest in legal protection. The initial protective custody and its continuation had been thoroughly examined in prior, recent decisions, and the appellant failed to demonstrate any changed circumstances that would justify an immediate review, making the lower court's refusal to rule on the merits appropriate.
Legislator headnote
OfficialArt. 397d Abs. 2 ZGB. Die Einreichung von aufeinander folgenden Entlassungsgesuchen aus der fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) steht unter dem Vorbehalt des Handelns nach Treu und Glauben. | Familienrecht
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the reasoning section as the legal basis allowing repeated appeals regarding release from compulsory treatment, which informs the context of the case's procedural history.
Full text
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · II. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht
Entscheiddatum: · 18.07.2005
Fallnummer: · 30 05 9
LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 12
Leitsatz: · Art. 397d Abs. 2 ZGB. Die Einreichung von aufeinander folgenden Entlassungsgesuchen aus der fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) steht unter dem Vorbehalt des Handelns nach Treu und Glauben.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.