Custody Dispute: Duty to Investigate and Issue Orders Under Child Protection Law
Legislator summary
AI generatedIn a case concerning the custody and parental authority of an unmarried couple's child, where the father had requested regulation of these matters, the lower authority improperly dismissed the application without entering proceedings. The reviewing court held that the guardianship authority, under child protection law (Art. 307 ff. ZGB), is bound by an investigative maxim and must make the necessary orders as it deems appropriate, irrespective of the specific request made by an applicant, meaning it could not simply refuse to address the substance by issuing a non-entry decision, even if the requested remedy (like child custody withdrawal) fell outside its sole competence, as it was obligated either to examine alternative measures or forward the file to the competent supervisory authority.
Legislator headnote
OfficialArt. 307 ff. ZGB. Die Vormundschaftsbehörde hat im Bereich des Kindesschutzmassnahmerechts unabhängig vom konkret gestellten Antrag die ihr richtig erscheinenden Anordnungen zu treffen. | Familienrecht
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedThis article defines the scope of child protection measures, which the court used to determine the Vormundschaftsbehörde's duty to act independently of the specific request.
Full text
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · II. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht
Entscheiddatum: · 11.11.2005
Fallnummer: · 30 05 7
LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 9
Leitsatz: · Art. 307 ff. ZGB. Die Vormundschaftsbehörde hat im Bereich des Kindesschutzmassnahmerechts unabhängig vom konkret gestellten Antrag die ihr richtig erscheinenden Anordnungen zu treffen.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.