Legislator Case Law & Legislation
30 05 20 • KG LU 30 05 20 AI generated

Applicant v. Legal Aid Authority on Cost Advance in Adoption Proceedings

Case Number 30 05 20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

An applicant seeking free legal aid within adoption proceedings, after being required to pay a cost advance by the authority, successfully appealed the denial of aid. The initial denial was based on the argument that the adoption was initiated voluntarily by the applicant as a matter of discretionary need, not necessitated by external circumstances. The appellate court found this reasoning inconsistent with constitutional law, reasoning that free legal aid, as an exemption from costs under relevant statute and to ensure access to justice and safeguard party rights as guaranteed by the constitution, must generally be considered for any state procedure, including those initiated by the party, provided the party lacks the necessary means and has a legitimate interest in the expedient handling of the matter.

Legislator headnote

Official

§ 204 VRG; Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV. Das im Rahmen eines Adoptionsverfahrens gestellte Gesuch um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege kann nicht allein mit der Begründung verweigert werden, der Gesuchsteller habe aus eigener Initiative ein Adoptionsgesuch gestellt, zu welchem er ohne äussere Umstände veranlasst worden sei. | Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht

Keywords

AI generated
adoption proceedings legal aid costs rights of access constitution interest in bringing an action free proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 204 VRG

The court relied on this provision regarding the exemption from costs and advance payments when granting legal aid.

Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV

The court used this constitutional provision regarding the right to free legal aid when the application is not without merit.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 27.01.2006

Fallnummer: · 30 05 20

LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 44

Leitsatz: · § 204 VRG; Art. 29 Abs. 3 BV. Das im Rahmen eines Adoptionsverfahrens gestellte Gesuch um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege kann nicht allein mit der Begründung verweigert werden, der Gesuchsteller habe aus eigener Initiative ein Adoptionsgesuch gestellt, zu welchem er ohne äussere Umstände veranlasst worden sei.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.