Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
2N 11 15 • KG LU 2N 11 15 AI generated

Standing of Non-Party Procedural Participants to Appeal Criminal Decisions

Case Number 2N 11 15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed the standing of non-party procedural participants, specifically the injured person or complainant, to appeal a decision under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court reasoned that while formal parties are clearly entitled to appeal, "other procedural participants" acquire party status and thus the right to appeal (beschwerdelegitimiert) only if they are *directly affected in their rights* by the decision in question, such as a decision to discontinue proceedings; a mere complainant without direct material impact on their legally protected interests lacks the standing to challenge the discontinuation of the criminal proceedings.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 105 Abs. 1 und 2, 322 Abs. 2, 382 Abs. 1 und 393 ff. StPO. Verfahrensbeteiligte wie die geschädigte Person oder der Anzeigeerstatter erlangen Parteistellung, wenn sie in ihren Rechten unmittelbar betroffen werden. Entsprechend sind sie beschwerdelegitimiert. | Strafprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
standing to appeal code of criminal procedure indictment procedural rights discontinuation of proceedings legally protected interest

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 382 Abs. 1 StPO
Cited in the summary reasoning regarding the right of any party with a legally protected interest to appeal.
Art. 38 Abs. 3 JStPO
Art. 105 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
Leitsatz: · Art. 105 Abs.
Art. 118 StPO
Art. 105 Abs. 2 StPO
Leitsatz: · Art. 105 Abs.
Art. 322 Abs. 2 StPO
Cited in the summary reasoning regarding who is legitimized to appeal, contrasting parties with other participants.
Art. 105 StPO
Leitsatz: · Art. 105 Abs.
Art. 322 StPO
AI generated
2N 12 138
Criminal Complainant Standing to Appeal Prosecutor Non-Prosecution Decision
1C 19 1
Appealability of Orders Compelling Non-Party Document Production
2N 17 104
Appeal Dismissal for Lack of Standing in False Testimony Case Pending Civil Suit

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 393 ff. StPO

The appeal was not admitted because the appellant, as a mere complainant, lacked the legitimacy to challenge the indictment dismissal under these articles.

Art. 322 Abs. 2 StPO

Cited in the summary reasoning regarding who is legitimized to appeal, contrasting parties with other participants.

Art. 382 Abs. 1 StPO

Cited in the summary reasoning regarding the right of any party with a legally protected interest to appeal.

Art. 105 Abs. 1 und 2 StPO

Cited in the summary reasoning regarding the procedural rights afforded to other participants if they are directly affected by procedural acts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · 2. Abteilung

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 15.06.2011

Fallnummer: · 2N 11 15

LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 46

Leitsatz: · Art. 105 Abs. 1 und 2, 322 Abs. 2, 382 Abs. 1 und 393 ff. StPO. Verfahrensbeteiligte wie die geschädigte Person oder der Anzeigeerstatter erlangen Parteistellung, wenn sie in ihren Rechten unmittelbar betroffen werden. Entsprechend sind sie beschwerdelegitimiert.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.