Legislator Case Law & Legislation
22 10 35 • KG LU 22 10 35 AI generated

Modification of Post-Divorce Support Upon Remarriage: Prioritization and Calculation of Obligor's Capacity

Case Number 22 10 35
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a judgment modification case concerning post-divorce support obligations following the obligor's remarriage, the court affirmed that the obligor's duty to support the former spouse is generally equal in rank to the duty owed to the new spouse, but the support claim for minor children takes priority. The court reasoned that the new spouse has a legal duty to assist the obligor, potentially requiring self-restraint, and special efforts can be demanded from the obligor and the new spouse (who knew of the existing obligations) to maintain prior support levels; however, this duty is limited to ensuring the obligor could pay the support even if unmarried, meaning the new spouse cannot indirectly support the former spouse, necessitating a calculation of the obligor's needs as a single person while accounting for shared living expenses without an automatic reduction based on the cohabitation.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 159 Abs. 3, 278 Abs. 2 und 285 ZGB. Unterhaltspflicht des Klägers gegenüber der Beklagten und seiner neuen Ehefrau ist grundsätzlich gleichrangig. Beistandspflicht der neuen Ehefrau. Unterhaltsanspruch der unmündigen Kinder ist prioritär. | Familienrecht

Keywords

AI generated
remarriage spouse post-divorce maintenance modification duty of support unmarried persons legal capacity

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 79 II 137
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 25.06.2010

Fallnummer: · 22 10 35

LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 2

Leitsatz: · Art. 159 Abs. 3, 278 Abs. 2 und 285 ZGB. Unterhaltspflicht des Klägers gegenüber der Beklagten und seiner neuen Ehefrau ist grundsätzlich gleichrangig. Beistandspflicht der neuen Ehefrau. Unterhaltsanspruch der unmündigen Kinder ist prioritär.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.