Legislator Case Law & Legislation
22 06 87 • KG LU 22 06 87 AI generated

Swiss Jurisdiction for Marital Protection Measures Pending Foreign Divorce

Case Number 22 06 87
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

A court was asked to rule on the jurisdiction of a Swiss court to issue marital protection measures (Eheschutzmassnahmen) under Article 175 of the Civil Code, despite a divorce action pending abroad. The court reasoned that Swiss courts retain jurisdiction to grant such measures under Article 10 of the Private International Law Act (IPRG) when the divorce proceedings are pending elsewhere and the foreign court has not issued equivalent, enforceable provisional measures, as the goal is to ensure continuous legal protection for the separation period, which cannot be jeopardized by complex recognition issues in the summary proceedings. This jurisdiction under Article 10 IPRG applies even if the foreign court has since rendered a divorce decree, as the core need for protection remains until the foreign judgment is recognized and enforced in Switzerland.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 175 ZGB; Art. 10 und 62 Abs. 1 IPRG. Zuständigkeit des schweizerischen Gerichts zum Erlass von Eheschutzmassnahmen bei im Ausland hängiger Scheidungsklage. | Familienrecht

Keywords

AI generated
marital protection measures foreign law divorce proceedings provisional measures pending proceedings civil judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 175 ZGB

This provision is cited in the decision summary (Leitsatz) and concerns the basis for the relief sought (Eheschutzmassnahmen).

Art. 10 IPRG

This provision is cited in the decision summary (Leitsatz) and applied to establish the jurisdiction of the Swiss court to issue precautionary measures when a divorce case is pending abroad.

Art. 62 Abs. 1 IPRG

This provision is cited in the decision summary (Leitsatz) regarding the jurisdiction for precautionary measures, although it was ultimately found not to apply directly in this specific context.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 29.09.2006

Fallnummer: · 22 06 87

LGVE: · 2007 I Nr. 10

Leitsatz: · Art. 175 ZGB; Art. 10 und 62 Abs. 1 IPRG. Zuständigkeit des schweizerischen Gerichts zum Erlass von Eheschutzmassnahmen bei im Ausland hängiger Scheidungsklage.

Rechtskraft: · Noch nicht rechtskräftig.