Support Payments Versus Vested Pension Benefits Seizure
Legislator summary
AI generatedFollowing a divorce decree ordering spousal and child support payments, the recipient sought to secure these amounts by ordering the seizure and payment from the obligor's vested benefits (Freizügigkeitsguthaben). The court ruled that under relevant federal law, security measures and debtor assignments for support payments against vested benefits accounts can only be executed upon the actual lump-sum payout of the funds, which occurs either upon withdrawal under specific provisions, reaching the statutory retirement age, or in the event of disability, because the funds must otherwise remain within the protected pension scheme circulation. Consequently, the lower court's decision to secure the vested benefits and order payments was overturned because the account holder had not requested a lump-sum payout.
Legislator headnote
OfficialArt. 132 Abs. 1 und 2; Art. 291 und 292 ZGB; Art. 5 FZG. Die Sicherstellung und die Schuldneranweisung für Unterhaltsbeiträge können bei einem Freizügigkeitsguthaben erst im Barauszahlungsfall nach Art. 5 FZG oder nach Erreichen des AHV-Alters oder bei Invalidität des Versicherten erfolgen. | Familienrecht
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedThis provision concerns the security/safeguarding measures which the court ultimately ruled could not be maintained against the vested benefits account.
This provision concerns the assignment to the creditor, which the court ruled could not be made because no assets were secured.
This provision concerns the assignment to the creditor, which the court ruled could not be made because no assets were secured.
This provision defines the conditions under which a vested benefits account can be paid out in cash, which the court used as the crucial factor preventing the securing of the funds.
Full text
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · II. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht
Entscheiddatum: · 12.01.2006
Fallnummer: · 22 05 113
LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 2
Leitsatz: · Art. 132 Abs. 1 und 2; Art. 291 und 292 ZGB; Art. 5 FZG. Die Sicherstellung und die Schuldneranweisung für Unterhaltsbeiträge können bei einem Freizügigkeitsguthaben erst im Barauszahlungsfall nach Art. 5 FZG oder nach Erreichen des AHV-Alters oder bei Invalidität des Versicherten erfolgen.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.