Legislator Case Law & Legislation
22 03 20 • KG LU 22 03 20 AI generated

Paternity Suit DNA Test Granted Without Hearing Overturned

Case Number 22 03 20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome annulled

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a pending paternity suit, a request for preliminary evidence, specifically a DNA test, was granted without hearing the opposing party, prompting an appeal. The court overturned the lower court's evidence order, reasoning that under constitutional guarantees, the opposing party in preliminary evidence proceedings must generally be heard to ensure their right to legal representation and participation, unless an urgent risk justifies immediate action, and that the decision must also be reasoned and include instructions on appeal rights; the court found that the failure to solicit a response and provide a sufficient explanation constituted a violation of the right to be heard that was not cured by the appeal itself.

Legislator headnote

Official

§§ 228 und 232 Abs. 1 ZPO; Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV. Verletzung des rechtlichen Gehörs. Im Verfahren betreffend vorsorgliche Beweisabnahme ist die Gegenpartei grundsätzlich anzuhören; der Entscheid ist zu begründen und mit einer Rechtsmittelbelehrung zu versehen. | Zivilprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
paternity action right to be heard failure to provide evidence preliminary decision pending proceedings right to know one's parentage

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 232 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited as one of the bases for annulling the decision due to violation of the right to be heard in the context of preliminary evidence taking.

§ 228 ZPO

Cited as one of the bases for annulling the decision, as it regulates the preliminary evidence taking procedure.

Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV

Cited as one of the bases for annulling the decision due to violation of the constitutional right to be heard.

§ 61 Abs. 1 ZPO

Cited as the procedural basis for annulling the preliminary evidence taking decision due to the violation of the right to be heard.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 13.05.2003

Fallnummer: · 22 03 20

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 44

Leitsatz: · §§ 228 und 232 Abs. 1 ZPO; Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV. Verletzung des rechtlichen Gehörs. Im Verfahren betreffend vorsorgliche Beweisabnahme ist die Gegenpartei grundsätzlich anzuhören; der Entscheid ist zu begründen und mit einer Rechtsmittelbelehrung zu versehen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.