Legislator Case Law & Legislation
22 03 12 • KG LU 22 03 12 AI generated

Appellate Court Ruling on Custody: Failure to Hear Children

Case Number 22 03 12
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a dispute over child custody, the appellate court found that the lower court violated mandatory provisions of the relevant Civil Code articles and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child by failing to personally hear the children, who were of an age and maturity where such a hearing was appropriate, without providing sufficient justification. Despite this procedural violation constituting a denial of the right to be heard, the appellate court, exercising its full review capacity and prioritizing the need for prompt resolution in the best interest of the child, decided to rule on the merits itself rather than remanding the case for a rehearing.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 144 Abs. 2 und 176 Abs. 3 ZGB; Art. 12 UNO-Übereinkommen über die Rechte des Kindes. Bei Obhutszuteilungsfragen sind die Kinder anzuhören, soweit nicht ihr Alter oder andere gewichtige Gründe dagegen sprechen. | Familienrecht

Keywords

AI generated
hearing of the child review on the merits children's rights violation of procedural rights deprivation of parental authority civil dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 144 Abs. 2 ZGB

This article, concerning the obligation to hear children in custody matters, was cited in the section of the decision setting out the grounds for the ruling.

Art. 176 Abs. 3 ZGB

This article, concerning the obligation to hear children in custody matters, was cited in the section of the decision setting out the grounds for the ruling.

Art. 12 UNO-Übereinkommen über die Rechte des Kindes

This article, concerning the right of the child to be heard, was cited in the section of the decision setting out the grounds for the ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 30.05.2003

Fallnummer: · 22 03 12

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 6

Leitsatz: · Art. 144 Abs. 2 und 176 Abs. 3 ZGB; Art. 12 UNO-Übereinkommen über die Rechte des Kindes. Bei Obhutszuteilungsfragen sind die Kinder anzuhören, soweit nicht ihr Alter oder andere gewichtige Gründe dagegen sprechen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.