Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
22 02 39 • KG LU 22 02 39 AI generated

Appeal Dismissed for Unpaid Court Costs; Reinstatement Denied

Case Number 22 02 39
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court upheld the non-admission of an appeal due to the failure to pay the required court cost advance, rejecting the motion for reinstatement of the missed deadline under § 90 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court reasoned that the alleged loss by postal service of the judicial order forwarded by the legal representative to the client for payment did not constitute an excusable impediment, as reinstatement requires objective impossibility or excessive demands for compliance, and it remains the attorney's duty, as part of diligent mandate management, to verify the timely payment when delegating the task to the client.

Legislator headnote

Official

§ 90 ZPO. Wiederherstellung der versäumten Frist zur Bezahlung des Gerichtskostenvorschusses. Die Tatsache, dass die an den Rechtsvertreter gerichtete und von diesem zwecks Bezahlung an den Klienten weitergeleitete gerichtliche Verfügung bei der Post angeblich verloren ging, bildet kein entschuldbares Hindernis für die Fristversäumnis. Pflicht des Anwalts, sich zu vergewissern, dass der Kostenvorschuss fristgerecht geleistet wird. | Zivilprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
unpaid cost advance order to pay compliance with deadline Civil Procedure Code appealability of remand decision late objection to debt enforcement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 175 ZGB
§ 90 ZPO
This provision was applied to reject the request for reinstatement of the missed deadline for the court cost deposit.
AI generated
2N 14 65
Appeal on Refusal of Further Deferment of Criminal Procedure Costs
11 98 180
Appeal Deadline Reinstatement Denial Due to Attorney Negligence
1H 18 2
Denial of Immediate Financial Assistance for Appeal Costs Upheld Due to Procedural Failures
2N 15 159
Appeal Regarding Denial of Court Cost Waiver Based on Disposable Income
22 98 113
Appeal Regarding Allocation of Costs for Reasoned Judicial Decision

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 90 ZPO

This provision was applied to reject the request for reinstatement of the missed deadline for the court cost deposit.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 13.05.2002

Fallnummer: · 22 02 39

LGVE: · 2002 I Nr. 34

Leitsatz: · § 90 ZPO. Wiederherstellung der versäumten Frist zur Bezahlung des Gerichtskostenvorschusses. Die Tatsache, dass die an den Rechtsvertreter gerichtete und von diesem zwecks Bezahlung an den Klienten weitergeleitete gerichtliche Verfügung bei der Post angeblich verloren ging, bildet kein entschuldbares Hindernis für die Fristversäumnis. Pflicht des Anwalts, sich zu vergewissern, dass der Kostenvorschuss fristgerecht geleistet wird.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.