Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Despite Counsel's Inquiry on Appellate Remedy

The court dismissed an appeal because it was filed after the statutory ten-day deadline had expired, despite the appellant's counsel arguing that the delay was caused by inquiring with the prosecuting authority about the correct appellate remedy after the decision was issued without a formal instruction on remedies. The court reasoned that the party pursuing an appeal bears the sole responsibility for timely filing, and an inquiry to the decision-making authority regarding the applicable legal remedy does not suspend or alter the appeal deadline, nor does it establish grounds for the restoration of the missed deadline because the means of appeal were implicitly or explicitly available through law and existing precedent.