Legislator Case Law & Legislation
21 09 123 • KG LU 21 09 123 AI generated

Daily Fine Rate Calculation and Minimum Benchmark

Case Number 21 09 123
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed a dispute over the daily fine rate (Tagessatz) for a convicted person, where the lower court set it at CHF 5 despite the prosecution requesting at least CHF 10 based on recent federal jurisprudence. The appellate court reasoned that while the daily rate is primarily based on the accused's income, including in-kind benefits is necessary to determine actual economic capacity, especially when income is low or derived substantially from support. Factoring in half the rent paid by the spouse and estimated living expenses, the accused's calculated net monthly income was very low, leading to a daily net income of approximately CHF 9.50 after necessary deductions for a child. Consequently, the court determined the daily rate must be set at the minimum federal benchmark of CHF 10 to avoid being perceived as merely symbolic, concluding that for individuals in reasonably stable circumstances, a concrete calculation considering living expenses rarely yields a rate below this threshold.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 34 Abs. 2 StGB. Bei einem Angeklagten, der in einigermassen geregelten Verhältnissen lebt, kommt bei konkreter Berechnung des Lebensaufwandes die Höhe des Tagessatzes kaum je unter die vom Bundesgericht geforderten Fr. 10.-- zu liegen. | Strafrecht

Keywords

AI generated
calculation of fine net income minimum income child support living expenses daily wage

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 34 Abs. 2 StGB

This article governed the determination of the daily rate for the fine, which was the core issue addressed by the court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 02.03.2010

Fallnummer: · 21 09 123

LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 38

Leitsatz: · Art. 34 Abs. 2 StGB. Bei einem Angeklagten, der in einigermassen geregelten Verhältnissen lebt, kommt bei konkreter Berechnung des Lebensaufwandes die Höhe des Tagessatzes kaum je unter die vom Bundesgericht geforderten Fr. 10.-- zu liegen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.