Legislator Case Law & Legislation
21 07 80 • KG LU 21 07 80 AI generated

Turning Driver's Duty of Care in Multi-Vehicle Pedestrian Incident

Case Number 21 07 80
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

An intoxicated driver proceeding to execute a left turn from the center lane of a main road failed to observe a pedestrian who suddenly ran into the street from the right and was struck first by a parallel vehicle before being thrown into the path of the turning driver, who then ran over the victim. The court reasoned that the turning driver's primary duty of care under traffic regulations required focusing attention primarily to the left, as he was already initiating the turn, and based on the principle of trust, he was not reasonably obligated to anticipate a dangerous situation arising from the right, especially with another vehicle proceeding correctly alongside him; therefore, failing to see the pedestrian before the initial impact did not constitute a breach of the required duty of attention.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 31 Abs. 1 SVG, Art. 3 Abs. 1 VRV, Art. 26 Abs. 2 SVG, Art. 26 Abs. 1 SVG; Turning Driver's Duty of Care in Multi-Vehicle Pedestrian Incident: Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strassenverkehrsrecht Entscheiddatum: · 27.11.2007 Fallnummer: · 21 07 80 LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 50 Leitsatz: · Art. 31 Abs. 1 SVG. Erforderliches Mass an Aufmerksamkeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.

Keywords

AI generated
duty of care traffic accident right-of-way violation illegal overtaking manoeuvre aggravated drunk driving fitness to drive

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 103 IV 104
BGE 122 IV 228
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strassenverkehrsrecht Entscheiddatum: · 27.11.2007 Fallnummer: · 21 07 80 LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 50 Leitsatz: · Art. 31 Abs. 1 SVG. Erforderliches Mass an Aufmerksamkeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.