Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
21 06 188 • KG LU 21 06 188 AI generated

Dealer Plate Unauthorized Use Conviction Reversed on Transfer Trip Interpretation

Case Number 21 06 188
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Court Costs Borne by public authority
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court reviewed a conviction for the unauthorized use of a dealer's license plate on a vehicle being driven to a repair shop. The court reasoned that transporting a vehicle to be repaired or serviced falls under the definition of a "transfer trip" pursuant to the relevant traffic ordinance, as such a journey is necessary for and in the interest of the operating business, thus qualifying for the temporary use of a dealer's plate under the given circumstances, reversing the lower court's stricter interpretation which had required the trip to be strictly indispensable to the business itself, separate from customer convenience.

Legislator headnote

Official

Die Fahrt mit dem zu reparierenden Fahrzeug in die Reparaturwerkstätte stellt eine Überführungsfahrt im Sinne von Art. 25 Abs. 3 VVV dar, für welche unter gegebenen Voraussetzungen die Verwendung eines Händlerschildes zulässig ist. | Strafrecht

Keywords

AI generated
misuse of permits and plates use of motor vehicle infringement committed negligently revocation of a licence contract for vehicle sale gross traffic violation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 25 Abs. 3 VVV
Leitsatz: · Die Fahrt mit dem zu reparierenden Fahrzeug in die Reparaturwerkstätte stellt eine Überführungsfahrt im Sinne von Art. 25 Abs. 3 VVV dar, für welche unter gegebenen Voraussetzungen die Verwendung eines Händlerschildes zulässig ist.
Art. 60 Ziff. 2 Abs. 3 VVV
Art. 24 Abs. 1 VVV
Art. 93 Ziff. 2 SVG
Art. 25 VVV
Leitsatz: · Die Fahrt mit dem zu reparierenden Fahrzeug in die Reparaturwerkstätte stellt eine Überführungsfahrt im Sinne von Art. 25 Abs.
Art. 24 VVV
Art. 25 Abs. 2 VVV
The court found that the factual requirements of this provision concerning the use of dealer plates by authorized third parties during a vehicle transfer in the interest of the business were met.
Art. 24 Abs. 3 VVV
AI generated
OG 1994 56
State v. [Appellant Name Regarding Embezzlement of Leased Vehicle]
21 05 59
Driving with Revoked Authorization vs. Physical License Possession
2N 17 93
Foreign Entity Traffic Fine Objection Withdrawal Reversal
21 04 103
Improper Excuse of Defendant's Appearance in Driving Without License Case
KA 03 139
Appellate Commission Confirms Annulment of Vehicle Seizure in Criminal Case Due to Third-Party Ownership

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 25 Abs. 2 VVV

The court found that the factual requirements of this provision concerning the use of dealer plates by authorized third parties during a vehicle transfer in the interest of the business were met.

Art. 24 Abs. 3 lit. b KoV

The court found that the trip was covered by this provision as it was undeniably related to the vehicle's repair.

§ 246 Ziff. 4 StPO

Cited as the ground for cassation because the conviction violated substantive federal law (material right).

§ 251 Abs. 4 StPO

Used to acquit the accused of guilt and sentence in the newly assessed matter after annulling the lower court's judgment.

Art. 78 ff. BGG

Cited in the dispositive to inform parties about the admissibility of an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

Art. 90 ff. BGG

Cited in the dispositive to inform parties about the admissibility of an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

Art. 42 BGG

Cited in the dispositive regarding the requirements for submitting an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

Art. 99 BGG

Cited in the dispositive regarding the submission deadline for an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

Art. 95 ff. BGG

Cited in the dispositive regarding the grounds for appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 09.02.2007

Fallnummer: · 21 06 188

LGVE:

Leitsatz: · Die Fahrt mit dem zu reparierenden Fahrzeug in die Reparaturwerkstätte stellt eine Überführungsfahrt im Sinne von Art. 25 Abs. 3 VVV dar, für welche unter gegebenen Voraussetzungen die Verwendung eines Händlerschildes zulässig ist.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.