Legislator Case Law & Legislation
21 06 161 • KG LU 21 06 161 AI generated

Convicted Person's Liability for Private Complainant's Attorney Fees

Case Number 21 06 161
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Court Costs Borne by public authority

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed an appeal concerning the allocation of legal costs after a criminal conviction, specifically whether the convicted person should bear the private complainant's attorney fees incurred during the trial court proceedings. The reasoning emphasized that under the relevant statute, a convicted person is generally responsible for costs, including the opposing party's attorney fees, but can be exempted "to the extent that he did not cause the costs." The court found that although the initial incident was minor, the complainant was justified in retaining counsel to understand procedural obligations and potential cost risks, especially since the defendant contested the charges until the trial, making the expense necessary and proportionate, thus warranting that the convicted person cover these costs unless they were unnecessarily incurred, which was not the case here despite the complainant's minimal involvement in the actual hearing.

Legislator headnote

Official

§ 275 Abs. 3 Ziff. 2 StPO. Kostentragung durch den Verurteilten. Der Verurteilte kann von den Kosten ganz oder teilweise befreit werden, wenn und soweit er die Kosten nicht veranlasst hat. Insbesondere bei Bagatellstreitigkeiten hat er keine Anwaltskosten der Gegenpartei zu tragen. | Strafprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
legal fees necessary expense associated action for damages opposing counsel private criminal prosecution legal malpractice liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 275 Abs. 3 Ziff. 2 StPO

This provision is the primary basis for partially exempting the convicted person from costs because he did not cause them to the extent they were incurred by the private prosecutor's lawyer.

§ 278 Abs. 1 StPO

Mentioned in the reasoning to explain the potential cost risk to the private prosecutor, which justified hiring a lawyer.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 06.02.2007

Fallnummer: · 21 06 161

LGVE: · 2007 I Nr. 56

Leitsatz: · § 275 Abs. 3 Ziff. 2 StPO. Kostentragung durch den Verurteilten. Der Verurteilte kann von den Kosten ganz oder teilweise befreit werden, wenn und soweit er die Kosten nicht veranlasst hat. Insbesondere bei Bagatellstreitigkeiten hat er keine Anwaltskosten der Gegenpartei zu tragen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.