Legislator Case Law & Legislation
21 04 64 • KG LU 21 04 64 AI generated

Magistrate's Delayed Authorization of Defense Visit Violated Right to Counsel

Case Number 21 04 64
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court overturned a lower authority's rejection of a defense attorney's complaint alleging undue delay in obtaining permission to visit a detained suspect, even though the delay occurred during intensive police operations involving the investigating magistrate. The court reasoned that the magistrate's failure to respond to the request for a visit authorization within two working days and his subsequent unavailability constituted an unjustified delay of an official act, violating the suspect's constitutional right to unimpeded contact with defense counsel under relevant procedural law and the European Convention on Human Rights, a right that could not be substituted by a later, supervised telephone conversation.

Legislator headnote

Official

§§ 67 und 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 StPO; Art. 6 Ziff. 3 lit. c EMRK. Entscheidet der Amtsstatthalter das Gesuch eines Verteidigers um Bewilligung eines Besuchs bei einem verhafteten Angeschuldigten nicht innert zwei Arbeitstagen und ist er für den Verteidiger in dieser Zeit auch nicht erreichbar, so liegt ein unberechtigtes Verzögern einer Amtshandlung vor. | Strafprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
unjustified procedural delay human rights procedural rights magistrate official defense counsel judicial breach of duty

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 6 Ziff. 3 lit. c EMRK
This provision was used to establish the right to contact between the defense counsel and the detainee, which was unduly hindered by the delay.
§§ 67 und 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 StPO
These provisions were used to establish that the public prosecutor's office decision constituted an unjustified delay in official action by the investigating magistrate.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§§ 67 und 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 StPO

These provisions were used to establish that the public prosecutor's office decision constituted an unjustified delay in official action by the investigating magistrate.

Art. 6 Ziff. 3 lit. c EMRK

This provision was used to establish the right to contact between the defense counsel and the detainee, which was unduly hindered by the delay.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 28.07.2004

Fallnummer: · 21 04 64

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 65

Leitsatz: · §§ 67 und 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 StPO; Art. 6 Ziff. 3 lit. c EMRK. Entscheidet der Amtsstatthalter das Gesuch eines Verteidigers um Bewilligung eines Besuchs bei einem verhafteten Angeschuldigten nicht innert zwei Arbeitstagen und ist er für den Verteidiger in dieser Zeit auch nicht erreichbar, so liegt ein unberechtigtes Verzögern einer Amtshandlung vor.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.