Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
21 04 224 • KG LU 21 04 224 AI generated

Prosecutor Violated Right to be Heard in Account Freeze Review Denial

Case Number 21 04 224
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court upheld a challenge against a prosecutor's decision that rejected a request to review a previously imposed account freeze, finding that the prosecutor violated the accused's right to be heard because the decision relied exclusively on unrecorded oral reports from the initial investigative authority and a written report that was only disclosed simultaneously with the final decision, thereby failing to meet the mandatory requirement for authorities to create records of procedural acts to enable the exercise of the right to inspect files.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV; §§ 66 und 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO. Das Akteneinsichtsrecht des Angeschuldigten setzt die Aktenführungspflicht der Behörde voraus. Stellt die Behörde bei ihrem Entscheid auf nicht protokollierte mündliche Amtsberichte oder auf erst mit dem Entscheid eröffnete Akten ab, so ist das rechtliche Gehör des Angeschuldigten verletzt. | Strafprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
procedural rights right to refuse testimony prosecutorial discretion judicial review seizure of evidence appealable interlocutory decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV
The constitutional guarantee of the right to be heard was violated because the Public Prosecutor relied on unrecorded oral reports and documents not previously served.
§ 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO
The violation of the right to be heard constituted a manifest violation of the law under this provision, justifying the action taken by the court.
§ 66 StPO
This provision, guaranteeing the right to inspect files, underpins the basis for the violation of the right to be heard.
AI generated
KA 01 132
Appeal Regarding Dismissal and Complainant's Right to Personal Hearing
JGKD 2002 1
Appeal Against Preliminary Deprivation of Legal Capacity Due to Procedural Flaws and Violation of Right to be Heard
21 97 161
Prosecutor's Refusal to Review Untimely Complaint Upheld
KA 02 154
Seizure Order Service and Appeal Period Commencement
2N 16 15
Prosecutor's Stay of Proceedings Appeal Admissibility Due to Defective Service Method

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV

The constitutional guarantee of the right to be heard was violated because the Public Prosecutor relied on unrecorded oral reports and documents not previously served.

§ 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO

The violation of the right to be heard constituted a manifest violation of the law under this provision, justifying the action taken by the court.

§ 66 StPO

This provision, guaranteeing the right to inspect files, underpins the basis for the violation of the right to be heard.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 03.12.2004

Fallnummer: · 21 04 224

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 59

Leitsatz: · Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV; §§ 66 und 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO. Das Akteneinsichtsrecht des Angeschuldigten setzt die Aktenführungspflicht der Behörde voraus. Stellt die Behörde bei ihrem Entscheid auf nicht protokollierte mündliche Amtsberichte oder auf erst mit dem Entscheid eröffnete Akten ab, so ist das rechtliche Gehör des Angeschuldigten verletzt.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.