Legislator Case Law & Legislation
21 04 103 • KG LU 21 04 103 AI generated

Improper Excuse of Defendant's Appearance in Driving Without License Case

Case Number 21 04 103
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court overturned a judgment convicting an individual for repeatedly driving without a license and remanded the case for a new trial because the trial court improperly excused the defendant's mandatory personal appearance. The court reasoned that the defendant's unsubstantiated claim of "very difficult circumstances" did not constitute a valid ground for dispensation under the procedural code, which clearly establishes personal appearance as the rule, necessary for the discovery of material truth and thorough personal investigation, especially given the defendant's history of a paranoid-manic disorder which warranted his in-person assessment regarding his current mental state and need for defense counsel.

Legislator headnote

Official

§ 170 Abs. 1 StPO. Pflicht des Angeklagten zum persönlichen Erscheinen an der Gerichtsverhandlung. Die Dispensation stellt die Ausnahme dar. | Strafprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
driving without authorization personal circumstances compulsory appearance before an authority unauthorized practice of law mandatory defense revocation of a licence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 06.07.2004

Fallnummer: · 21 04 103

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 68

Leitsatz: · § 170 Abs. 1 StPO. Pflicht des Angeklagten zum persönlichen Erscheinen an der Gerichtsverhandlung. Die Dispensation stellt die Ausnahme dar.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.