Landlord Liability for Building Insurance Premiums as Ancillary Costs
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court upheld the lower court's decision that a landlord could not charge a tenant for the building insurance premium as part of ancillary costs, reasoning that the statutory definition of ancillary costs under the Code of Obligations is mandatory, and costs not related to the tenant's use of the rented property, such as building insurance which falls under burdens and public charges (Art. 256b OR), cannot be validly stipulated as a divisible ancillary cost in the lease agreement; if the landlord intended to pass these costs to the tenant, they should have been included in the rent calculation from the outset.
Legislator headnote
OfficialArt. 256b OR; Art. 257a f. OR. Ein Mietvertrag kann nicht gültig vorsehen, dass eine Gebäudeversicherungsprämie als Nebenkosten zulasten der Mieter geht. | OR (Obligationenrecht)
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited as the legal basis classifying building insurance premiums under burdens and public charges, which cannot be validly passed on as ancillary costs.
Cited as the legal basis establishing the mandatory nature of the definition of ancillary costs, preventing the inclusion of the building insurance premium.
Full text
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · 1. Abteilung
Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)
Entscheiddatum: · 15.06.2011
Fallnummer: · 1C 11 9
LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 20
Leitsatz: · Art. 256b OR; Art. 257a f. OR. Ein Mietvertrag kann nicht gültig vorsehen, dass eine Gebäudeversicherungsprämie als Nebenkosten zulasten der Mieter geht.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.