Legislator Case Law & Legislation
1C 11 9 • KG LU 1C 11 9 AI generated

Landlord Liability for Building Insurance Premiums as Ancillary Costs

Case Number 1C 11 9
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision that a landlord could not charge a tenant for the building insurance premium as part of ancillary costs, reasoning that the statutory definition of ancillary costs under the Code of Obligations is mandatory, and costs not related to the tenant's use of the rented property, such as building insurance which falls under burdens and public charges (Art. 256b OR), cannot be validly stipulated as a divisible ancillary cost in the lease agreement; if the landlord intended to pass these costs to the tenant, they should have been included in the rent calculation from the outset.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 256b OR; Art. 257a f. OR. Ein Mietvertrag kann nicht gültig vorsehen, dass eine Gebäudeversicherungsprämie als Nebenkosten zulasten der Mieter geht. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
landlord liability insurance premium building lease rent statutory insurance obligation cost calculation public insurance

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 256b OR

Cited as the legal basis classifying building insurance premiums under burdens and public charges, which cannot be validly passed on as ancillary costs.

Art. 257a f. OR

Cited as the legal basis establishing the mandatory nature of the definition of ancillary costs, preventing the inclusion of the building insurance premium.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · 1. Abteilung

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 15.06.2011

Fallnummer: · 1C 11 9

LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 20

Leitsatz: · Art. 256b OR; Art. 257a f. OR. Ein Mietvertrag kann nicht gültig vorsehen, dass eine Gebäudeversicherungsprämie als Nebenkosten zulasten der Mieter geht.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.