Legislator Case Law & Legislation
12 04 1 1 • KG LU 12 04 1 1 AI generated

Fullwood Mark Invalidation for Abuse of Rights

Case Number 12 04 1 1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Court Costs Borne by public authority

Legislator summary

AI generated

The plaintiff sought the transfer or invalidation of a mark registration, asserting the defendant's registration of "Fullwood" was an abuse of rights because the mark was identical to the plaintiff's notoriously known mark, used in Switzerland for the same goods (milking machines) since 1975. The court concluded that the defendant, who clearly knew of the plaintiff's long-standing use and association with the mark through former employment with related entities, had no legitimate purpose for the registration; instead, the act aimed solely to exploit a formal legal advantage to hinder the established rights holder and monetize the situation, thus constituting an abuse of rights under Art. 2 para. 2 of the Civil Code, leading to the invalidation of the registration.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 2 Abs. 2 ZGB. Eine Markenanmeldung ist rechtsmissbräuchlich, wenn das Gesamtverhalten des Usurpators keinem legitimen Zweck dient, weil es allein darauf abzielt, eine formal bessere Rechtsstellung auszunutzen und unter Behinderung eines Kennzeicheninhabers zu Geld zu machen. | Markenschutz

Keywords

AI generated
right of use genuine use of a mark action for trademark invalidity established right nature of the infringement legal entity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 2 Abs. 2 ZGB

The registration of the mark by the defendant was declared void due to abuse of rights based on this provision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Markenschutz

Entscheiddatum: · 08.09.2004

Fallnummer: · 12 04 1.1

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 3

Leitsatz: · Art. 2 Abs. 2 ZGB. Eine Markenanmeldung ist rechtsmissbräuchlich, wenn das Gesamtverhalten des Usurpators keinem legitimen Zweck dient, weil es allein darauf abzielt, eine formal bessere Rechtsstellung auszunutzen und unter Behinderung eines Kennzeicheninhabers zu Geld zu machen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.