Legislator Case Law & Legislation
12 01 2 • KG LU 12 01 2 AI generated

Construction Permit Appeal Not an Abuse of Rights Under Cartel Law

Case Number 12 01 2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a claim for damages under cartel law, the court dismissed the action brought by a construction permit recipient against a competitor who had appealed the permit to the administrative court, which ultimately dismissed the appeal for lack of standing. The court reasoned that the competitor's administrative appeal challenging the simplified permit procedure for a concrete processing plant was not a tortious abuse of rights under cartel law because there was no established consensus on the standing of business competitors to challenge planning and building decisions, and the appeal raised legitimate concerns regarding the violation of building regulations that could directly impact competition, especially given that the facility's scope and cost suggested the simplified procedure was questionable.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. b KG; § 207 PBG. Schadenersatzpflicht des Konkurrenten gestützt auf das Kartellgesetz bei einer Beschwerde in Planungs- und Bausachen. | Kartellrecht

Keywords

AI generated
standing against building permit building regulations cartel actions for damages standing to appeal simplified building permit

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. b KG

This provision was cited in the headnote/decision summary regarding the claim for damages based on the Cartel Act.

§ 207 PBG

This provision was cited in the headnote/decision summary regarding the claim for damages in planning and construction law matters.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Kartellrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 17.09.2002

Fallnummer: · 12 01 2

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 26

Leitsatz: · Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. b KG; § 207 PBG. Schadenersatzpflicht des Konkurrenten gestützt auf das Kartellgesetz bei einer Beschwerde in Planungs- und Bausachen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.