Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 09 145 • KG LU 11 09 145 AI generated

Liability Privilege for Loaned Workers and Host Company Employees

Case Number 11 09 145
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court had to determine if the liability privilege under former Art. 44 para. 2 aUVG applies to a temporary or loaned worker who injures an employee of the host company. The court reasoned that the privilege is strictly interpreted based on the wording of the statute, which limits it to the employer who is legally connected via an employment contract and pays the mandatory insurance premiums. Since the loaned worker lacked a direct employment contract with the host company, they could not invoke the liability privilege, as the rationale for the privilege—financing the insurance system and maintaining internal labor peace—did not apply to temporary staff in this context.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 44 Abs. 2 aUVG. Das Haftungsprivileg kommt in Bezug auf einen Temporär- bzw. Leiharbeiter, der im Einsatzbetrieb einen Angestellten des Einsatzbetriebes schädigt, nicht zur Anwendung. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
liability privilege insurance financing temporary workers employment contracts limited liability insurance company

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 44 Abs. 2 aUVG
The main ground for the decision is the interpretation and application of this provision regarding the liability privilege for temporary workers.
Art. 44 Abs. 1 aUVG
Leitsatz: · Art. 44 Abs.
Art. 75 ATSG
Art. 129 Abs. 2 KUVG
Art. 44 aUVG
Leitsatz: · Art. 44 Abs.
Art. 321e OR
Art. 41 OR
Art. 55 OR

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 44 Abs. 2 aUVG

The main ground for the decision is the interpretation and application of this provision regarding the liability privilege for temporary workers.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 01.06.2010

Fallnummer: · 11 09 145

LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 23

Leitsatz: · Art. 44 Abs. 2 aUVG. Das Haftungsprivileg kommt in Bezug auf einen Temporär- bzw. Leiharbeiter, der im Einsatzbetrieb einen Angestellten des Einsatzbetriebes schädigt, nicht zur Anwendung.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.