Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 08 74 • KG LU 11 08 74 AI generated

Termination Validity During Partial Incapacity Under Article 336c(1)(b)

Case Number 11 08 74
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed the validity of a termination issued while an employee was partially incapacitated due to illness, specifically concerning the statutory protection period under Article 336c(1)(b) of the Code of Obligations. The court reasoned that this protective period applies only when the duration and extent of the incapacity make securing new employment by the time the ordinary notice period expires "highly improbable." Because the medical certificate indicated the employee was only unfit for night shifts and could perform regular daytime work, and the employee himself indicated a desire to seek future employment in a different field, the court found that the partial incapacity did not prevent him from finding new work, thus rendering the statutory protection period inapplicable and upholding the original termination as valid.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 336c Abs. 1 lit. b OR. Die Sperrfrist spielt, wenn eine Anstellung des Arbeitnehmers durch einen neuen Arbeitgeber auf den Zeitpunkt des Ablaufs der ordentlichen Kündigungsfrist im Hinblick auf die Ungewissheit über Fortdauer und Ausmass der Arbeitsunfähigkeit höchst unwahrscheinlich erscheint. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
duration of incapacity termination of employment notice period partial capacity for work medical reasons unpaid leave

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 336c Abs. 1 lit. b OR

This provision defines the protected period during which an employer cannot terminate employment due to the employee's incapacity for work, which was the central issue regarding the validity of the termination.

Art. 328 OR

Cited by the appellant regarding the employer's breach of the duty of care, although no claim was formally made based on this provision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 24.11.2008

Fallnummer: · 11 08 74

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 17

Leitsatz: · Art. 336c Abs. 1 lit. b OR. Die Sperrfrist spielt, wenn eine Anstellung des Arbeitnehmers durch einen neuen Arbeitgeber auf den Zeitpunkt des Ablaufs der ordentlichen Kündigungsfrist im Hinblick auf die Ungewissheit über Fortdauer und Ausmass der Arbeitsunfähigkeit höchst unwahrscheinlich erscheint.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.