Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 08 38 • KG LU 11 08 38 AI generated

Artisan's Lien Allocation for Unsubdivided Property Work

Case Number 11 08 38
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellant sought the provisional registration of a construction artisan's lien for piling work on several properties connected to a single development, initially requesting specific amounts for each parcel before the parcels were officially subdivided, and later requesting the entire sum be allocated across the three resulting parcels at the court's discretion. The court determined that the appellant's request was inadmissible under procedural law because the claim regarding the allocation of the total lien amount across the different parcels was indeterminate, as the appellant, aware of the recent subdivision and the precise nature of the work performed (piling), could and should have specified the amount attributable to each new property.

Legislator headnote

Official

§ 92 ZPO; Art. 837 Abs. 1 Ziff. 3 ZGB. Auf ein unbestimmtes Rechtsbegehren ist nicht einzutreten. Keine Aufteilung der Gesamtpfandsumme auf verschiedene Grundstücke nach richterlichem Ermessen bei Eintragung eines Bauhandwerkerpfandrechts. | Zivilprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
registration of construction lien property development allocation of work attachment of real property assignment of estate claims creation of a property right

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 116 II 219
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 92 ZPO

The court dismissed the claim because the request was too indeterminate, failing to meet the requirement of § 92 ZPO.

Art. 837 Abs. 1 Ziff. 3 ZGB

Cited in the summary as the substantive basis for the construction lien claim that was ultimately rejected due to procedural defects.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 05.06.2008

Fallnummer: · 11 08 38

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 30

Leitsatz: · § 92 ZPO; Art. 837 Abs. 1 Ziff. 3 ZGB. Auf ein unbestimmtes Rechtsbegehren ist nicht einzutreten. Keine Aufteilung der Gesamtpfandsumme auf verschiedene Grundstücke nach richterlichem Ermessen bei Eintragung eines Bauhandwerkerpfandrechts.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.