Revision Refused Due to Change in Legal Basis of Claim

The appellant sought revision of a final judgment that dismissed their loan repayment claim against a spouse, based on subsequently discovered facts concerning the couple's marital property agreement, alleging the funds were transferred solely to the spouse's account, leading to unjust enrichment. The court declined to entertain the revision request because the newly alleged basis for the claim—unjust enrichment due to a money transfer—constituted a fundamental shift in the legal and factual basis of the dispute from the original contractual loan claim against both spouses, which qualifies as an impermissible change of claim in revision proceedings under the relevant procedural law.