Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
11 08 143 2 • KG LU 11 08 143 2 AI generated

Plaintiff's Subsequent Submission on Amount in Dispute Admitted

Case Number 11 08 143 2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court held that a subsequent submission by the plaintiff regarding the amount in dispute must be admitted, as the determination of the cost allocation is an inherent part of the judgment and not subject to the principle of party disposition. The court reasoned that a judge is obliged to correct an apparently incorrectly stated value in dispute ex officio under the relevant procedural provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 252 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 207 lit. a ZPO, § 21 Abs. 2 ZPO; Plaintiff's Subsequent Submission on Amount in Dispute Admitted: The court reasoned that a judge is obliged to correct an apparently incorrectly stated value in dispute ex officio under the relevant procedural provisions.

Keywords

AI generated
value in dispute payment of monetary claim procedural costs obligation to quantify claims civil litigation procedure supplementary pleading

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 252 Abs. 1 ZPO
Basis for allowing the subsequent submission regarding the value of the dispute.
§ 207 lit. a ZPO
Cited alongside § 252 Abs. 1 ZPO for the court's authority to correct the value in dispute.
§ 21 Abs. 2 ZPO
Cited alongside § 252 Abs. 1 ZPO for the court's authority to correct the value in dispute.
AI generated
1C 12 46
Cost Allocation in Rent Reduction Dispute Following Procedural Misconduct
1B 11 62
Concession of Demands in Second Instance and Procedural Costs Allocation
1B 16 65
Third-Party Notice Admission Versus Jurisprudence on Claim Quantification

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 252 Abs. 1 ZPO

Basis for allowing the subsequent submission regarding the value of the dispute.

§ 207 lit. a ZPO

Cited alongside § 252 Abs. 1 ZPO for the court's authority to correct the value in dispute.

§ 21 Abs. 2 ZPO

Cited alongside § 252 Abs. 1 ZPO for the court's authority to correct the value in dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht Entscheiddatum: · 03.06.2009 Fallnummer: · 11 08 143.2 LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 38 Leitsatz: · § 252 Abs. 1 ZPO. Zulassung einer nachträglichen Eingabe zur Streitwerthöhe. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.