Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 07 91 • KG LU 11 07 91 AI generated

Supplementary Health Insurance Coverage Dispute for Non-Recognized Hospital Stay

Case Number 11 07 91
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed a dispute regarding the coverage of supplementary health insurance benefits for a hospital stay, where the policy stipulated coverage for general ward costs in Swiss public and private hospitals on the insurer's approved list with an agreed tariff, per Article 13.1 lit. l of the General Insurance Conditions (GIC). The court reasoned that the contract's content must be determined based on the agreed-upon GIC and specifically agreed clauses, explicitly excluding insurer communications in customer magazines as contractually binding declarations or a basis for deriving further claims, as these documents only provide an overview of services. Given that the specific hospital in question was not on the insurer's recognized tariff list at the time of treatment, and finding no evidence of a mutual understanding or a binding guarantee in the GIC or related regulations to cover treatments in non-recognized hospitals, the court concluded that the plaintiff had no claim for reimbursement under the supplementary insurance policy for the costs incurred.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 18 OR; Art. 2 Abs. 1 ZGB: Bestimmung des massgeblichen Inhalts des Versicherungsvertragsverhältnisses betreffend eine Zusatzversicherung zur obligatorischen Krankenversicherung (nach Versicherungsvertragsgesetz [VVG]). Bedeutung von Informationen in der Kundenzeitung des Versicherers. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
supplementary hospital insurance claim to insurance benefits health insurance costs cost coverage guarantee private insurance non-recognized health insurance fund

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 25.02.2008

Fallnummer: · 11 07 91

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 7

Leitsatz: · Art. 18 OR; Art. 2 Abs. 1 ZGB: Bestimmung des massgeblichen Inhalts des Versicherungsvertragsverhältnisses betreffend eine Zusatzversicherung zur obligatorischen Krankenversicherung (nach Versicherungsvertragsgesetz [VVG]). Bedeutung von Informationen in der Kundenzeitung des Versicherers.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.