Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 07 153 2 • KG LU 11 07 153 2 AI generated

Fraudulent Conveyance of Co-operative Shares and Apportionment of Litigation Costs

Case Number 11 07 153 2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant

Legislator summary

AI generated

Creditors filed a fraudulent conveyance action (Paulianische Anfechtung) under Art. 285 ff. SchKG against two defendants concerning the undervalued sale of co-operative shares, which represented an interest in a key real estate asset previously owned by the debtor. The court reasoned that the share transfers were indeed disadvantageous to the creditors' execution rights, confirming that co-operative shares are generally subject to seizure and that the transaction's economic substance was the sale of a significant portion of the underlying property value for less than what could have been obtained. While affirming the substantive liability of the defendants to compensate the creditors for the loss due to the avoidance of the initial transfer, the court partly adjusted the cost ruling, determining that the defendants, as simple joint parties (einfache Streitgenossen) who conducted their defense separately without objective necessity, were entitled to only one party compensation award in the first instance, leading to a partial success for the creditors' cross-appeal regarding costs.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 285 ff. SchKG und §§ 50 Abs. 2 und 122 ZPO. Paulianische Anfechtung und Parteientschädigung für einfache Streitgenossen sowie Haftung für Prozesskosten. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Keywords

AI generated
sale of shares liability for costs fraud on creditors real estate transactions economic loss party costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 288 SchKG

The decision is based on applying the rules of the paulian action (Anfechtungsklage) under Art. 288 SchKG, which governs the substance of the claim being reviewed.

§ 50 Abs. 2 ZPO

Used to justify the ruling concerning the entitlement to separate legal fees for the defendants acting as simple co-litigants.

§ 122 ZPO

Cited regarding the determination of separate liability for procedural costs between the co-defendants.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision, or its equivalent in Cantonal procedural law regarding costs (though often cited in connection with the LTF structure for final judgments concerning costs in appeal proceedings), is implicitly referred to as the basis for allocating the costs of the second instance appeal proceedings based on the outcome of the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 19.11.2008

Fallnummer: · 11 07 153.2

LGVE:

Leitsatz: · Art. 285 ff. SchKG und §§ 50 Abs. 2 und 122 ZPO. Paulianische Anfechtung und Parteientschädigung für einfache Streitgenossen sowie Haftung für Prozesskosten.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.