Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 07 116 1 • KG LU 11 07 116 1 AI generated

Validity of Non-Compete Clause After Mutual Termination Agreement

Case Number 11 07 116 1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed whether a non-compete clause remained valid after an employment relationship was terminated by a mutual agreement, even if the employer initiated the separation. The court reasoned that when an employment contract is ended by a mutually beneficial agreement involving concessions from both sides—such as an extended departure date, payment for outplacement services, and permission to take specific mandates for the employee, offset by the employee agreeing to the continuation of the non-compete clause—the clause does not lapse under the rule that typically invalidates it upon unilateral termination by the employer without fault of the employee, as the agreement was not a mere circumvention of the law but a genuine settlement.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 340c Abs. 2 OR. Wird das Arbeitsverhältnis durch eine beidseits vorteilhafte Übereinkunft mit gegenseitigem Entgegenkommen beendet, fällt das Konkurrenzverbot nicht dahin. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
validity of non-compete clause termination of a contract employment relationship effective clause in collective agreements special jurisdiction for employment contracts vested benefits agreement

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 340c Abs. 2 OR

This provision is cited in the leading principle (Leitsatz) which confirms the main legal finding of the appeal decision, despite the court concluding it does not apply in this specific case due to a valid settlement agreement.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 25.03.2008

Fallnummer: · 11 07 116.1

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 18

Leitsatz: · Art. 340c Abs. 2 OR. Wird das Arbeitsverhältnis durch eine beidseits vorteilhafte Übereinkunft mit gegenseitigem Entgegenkommen beendet, fällt das Konkurrenzverbot nicht dahin.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.