Appeal Against Refusal to Revoke Judicial Dissolution of Stock Corporation for Failure to Appoint Auditor
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court reviewed an appeal against the refusal to revoke the judicial dissolution of a stock corporation, which had been ordered because the company failed to pay the required security deposit for appointing an auditor as mandated by law. The appellate court reasoned that a judicial decision for dissolution under the specific sanction of Article 727f of the Code of Obligations, issued in summary, non-contentious proceedings, is not subject to the same material finality as a judgment from ordinary proceedings; therefore, under the applicable procedural law, such an order can be revoked if reasons of legal certainty do not prevent it, especially since the company subsequently complied with the requirement by appointing an auditor and this was done before any liquidation measures were taken.
Legislator headnote
OfficialArt. 727f Abs. 2 OR; § 238 lit. d ZPO. Widerruf der gerichtlichen Auflösung einer Aktiengesellschaft wegen nachträglicher Bestellung der Revisionsstelle. | OR (Obligationenrecht)
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedThis article established the legal basis for the initial dissolution which is now subject to revocation.
This procedural rule was used to justify the revocation of the decision in matters of voluntary jurisdiction.
This provision was used to order the appellant to bear all procedural costs.
Full text
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · I. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)
Entscheiddatum: · 13.11.2006
Fallnummer: · 11 06 91
LGVE: · 2007 I Nr. 26
Leitsatz: · Art. 727f Abs. 2 OR; § 238 lit. d ZPO. Widerruf der gerichtlichen Auflösung einer Aktiengesellschaft wegen nachträglicher Bestellung der Revisionsstelle.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.