Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 05 9 • KG LU 11 05 9 AI generated

Heirs' Claim Against Executor for Reimbursement of Excessive Advance Fee Payments and Applicable Limitation Period

Case Number 11 05 9
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case concerned the claim by heirs against an executor for the reimbursement of excessive advance payments received by the executor against his final fee, where the executor argued the claim was time-barred under the one-year limitation period for unjust enrichment (Art. 67 OR). The court held that the claim for reimbursement of advance payments made to an executor, which are provisional until a final accounting under the executor's duties (Art. 517 para. 3 ZGB and subsidiarily Art. 394 ff. OR), is not governed by the one-year limitation period of unjust enrichment, but by the ordinary limitation period, specifically the five-year period applicable to fee claims of legal professionals (Art. 128 Ziff. 3 OR), as advance payments are made under reservation of a final settlement and do not constitute final payments until that accounting is complete.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 517 Abs. 3 ZGB; Art. 127, 128 Ziff. 3 und 394 ff. OR. Verjährungsfrist für den Anspruch auf Rückerstattung zuviel bezogener Akontozahlungen des Willensvollstreckers. | Erbrecht

Keywords

AI generated
advance payments limitation periods heir claims settlement unjust enrichment professional fee

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 517 Abs. 3 ZGB

This article governs the executor's right to adequate remuneration, which is the subject matter underlying the dispute over advance payments.

Art. 128 Ziff. 3 OR

The court applied the five-year limitation period stipulated in this article to the claim for reimbursement of overpaid advance payments.

Art. 394 ff. OR

These provisions concerning the mandate contract are subsidiarily applied to the executor's liability and duties, impacting the nature of the claim.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Erbrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 21.01.2006

Fallnummer: · 11 05 9

LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 9

Leitsatz: · Art. 517 Abs. 3 ZGB; Art. 127, 128 Ziff. 3 und 394 ff. OR. Verjährungsfrist für den Anspruch auf Rückerstattung zuviel bezogener Akontozahlungen des Willensvollstreckers.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.