Withdrawal of Hearing Request Unchallengeable for Defect of Will; Party Responsibility for Factual Presentation Upheld

The appellant sought to invalidate their withdrawal of a request for a main hearing, claiming a mistake of basis, and argued the lower court erred by not setting a main hearing to allow for supplementation of facts and clarification of the claim's quantification. The court ruled that procedural acts by parties generally cannot be challenged due to defects of will, as they are not legal transactions, and the responsibility for factual presentation in an adversarial system rests solely with the parties; furthermore, the judicial duty to question serves only to clarify ambiguous situations, not to supplement missing essential factual allegations, nor is the court obligated to prompt the claimant to quantify their claim when the basis for the claim was already detailed.