Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 04 54 • KG LU 11 04 54 AI generated

Employee Dismissal Timing Dispute

Case Number 11 04 54
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The employer summarily dismissed the employee based on suspicion of embezzlement and fraudulent property damage related to manipulating parking garage exit times for free exits and misappropriating repair funds. The court held that while a valid reason for immediate termination existed, the employer forfeited the right to an immediate termination because the dismissal was not issued promptly upon gaining conclusive knowledge of the misconduct on July 9th; waiting until July 18th, even to await the return of a supervisor from vacation, was deemed an unreasonable delay when the facts were clear, indicating that adhering to the ordinary notice period was subjectively feasible for the employer.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 337 OR. Ist ein wichtiger Grund gegeben, so ist die fristlose Kündigung sofort auszu-sprechen. Andernfalls ist anzunehmen, das Einhalten der ordentlichen Kündigungsfrist sei für den Kündigenden subjektiv zumutbar und das Recht auf eine sofortige Vertragsauflösung verwirkt. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
immediate dismissal embezzlement unjustified termination of employment notice period termination date timeliness of recusal request

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 337 OR

This article is cited in the concluding statement ('Entscheid') to establish the legal standard regarding the immediate termination of an employment contract due to just cause, which serves as the main ground for the court's implicit finding regarding the validity of the termination.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 27.06.2005

Fallnummer: · 11 04 54

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 19

Leitsatz: · Art. 337 OR. Ist ein wichtiger Grund gegeben, so ist die fristlose Kündigung sofort auszu-sprechen. Andernfalls ist anzunehmen, das Einhalten der ordentlichen Kündigungsfrist sei für den Kündigenden subjektiv zumutbar und das Recht auf eine sofortige Vertragsauflösung verwirkt.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.