Timeliness of Judicial Disqualification Motions
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court affirmed that grounds for the disqualification of a judge must be raised at the first opportunity, consistent with the principles of good faith and prohibition of abuse of rights. The appellant sought to disqualify the judge based on alleged prior rulings in the matter and perceived errors in substantive or procedural law, but the court held that prior judicial activity alone is insufficient grounds for bias, and procedural or substantive errors must be challenged through appropriate appeal mechanisms, not as a basis for recusal; failure to raise a known ground for disqualification promptly constitutes a waiver of that objection.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§§ 38 ff. ZPO; Timeliness of Judicial Disqualification Motions: The appellant sought to disqualify the judge based on alleged prior rulings in the matter and perceived errors in substantive or procedural law, but the court held that prior judicial activity alone is insufficient grounds for bias, and procedural or substantive errors must be challenged through appropriate appeal mechanisms, not as a basis for recusal; failure to raise a known ground for disqualification promptly constitutes a waiver of that objection.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedThis provision defines the grounds for recusal (Ausstandsgründe) which the appellant failed to invoke at the proper time.
Full text
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht Entscheiddatum: · 03.02.2005 Fallnummer: · 11 04 33 LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 28 Leitsatz: · §§ 38 ff. ZPO. Ausstandsgründe sind bei erster Gelegenheit geltend zu machen. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.