Preliminary Evidence Taking Upheld Despite Objections to Standing

The court upheld the dismissal of objections raised against an order for the preliminary taking of evidence to ascertain the condition of a structure, reasoning that the purpose of such precautionary measures under $\S 228$ of the Civil Procedure Code is solely the securing of evidence, requiring only the credible demonstration of a looming loss of the evidence, not the merits of the main claim. Furthermore, the court held that objections concerning the respondent's lack of passive standing are generally inadmissible at this preliminary stage, as passive standing is a substantive requirement for the main action that should not be examined in the summary proceeding focused only on evidence preservation.