Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
11 02 71 • KG LU 11 02 71 AI generated

Prohibition on Altering Legal Claims on Appeal

Case Number 11 02 71
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court determined that the prohibition on altering legal claims in the second instance, as stipulated by the relevant procedural code, is absolute and is not negated by reserving the right to bring a subsequent claim, which would only permit the assertion of different claims in a separate future proceeding. Consequently, the court ruled that it could not consider the appeal where the appellant sought new or increased claims in the grounds of appeal, although a reduction of the legal claims remains permissible at any stage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 98 Abs. 2 ZPO, § 98 Abs. 3 ZPO; Prohibition on Altering Legal Claims on Appeal: Consequently, the court ruled that it could not consider the appeal where the appellant sought new or increased claims in the grounds of appeal, although a reduction of the legal claims remains permissible at any stage.

Keywords

AI generated
amendment of the claim procedural rights right to remain future claim prohibition of arbitrariness appealability of remand decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 98 Abs. 2 ZPO
Cited as the rule prohibiting the change of claims in the second instance, leading to the non-admission of the appeal concerning new or increased claims.
§ 98 Abs. 3 ZPO
Cited to distinguish that a restriction of the claims is always possible, even in the second instance.
AI generated
11 97 23 242
Appeal on Procedural Prohibition of New Evidence in Nullity Proceedings
11 03 23
Claim Value Reduction in Appeal Does Not Alter Procedural Basis
22 04 104
Admissibility of New Facts in Appeal Procedure
11 03 2
Claim and Request Amendments Under $\S 98$ Code of Civil Procedure
21 06 100 3
Appeal Conviction Reversal and Prohibition on Worsening Appellant's Position

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 98 Abs. 2 ZPO

Cited as the rule prohibiting the change of claims in the second instance, leading to the non-admission of the appeal concerning new or increased claims.

§ 98 Abs. 3 ZPO

Cited to distinguish that a restriction of the claims is always possible, even in the second instance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 26.06.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 02 71

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 34

Leitsatz: · § 98 Abs. 2 ZPO. Der Vorbehalt eines Nachklagerechts hebt das Klageänderungsverbot vor zweiter Instanz nicht auf.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.