Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
11 02 70 • KG LU 11 02 70 AI generated

Appeal Court Refuses Inadmissible Post-Pleading Submissions Due to Procedural Bars

Case Number 11 02 70
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

In an appeal concerning an employment dispute where parties submitted unauthorized documents after the pleadings concluded, the court ruled such submissions inadmissible because cantonal procedural law, including prohibitions on new evidence (Novensverbot) in the appellate stage, restricts the principle of inquiry (Untersuchungsgrundsatz) applicable in labor law matters. The court reasoned that the principle of inquiry under federal law does not relieve the appellant of the procedural duty to specifically articulate the points and reasons for challenging the contested judgment, meaning the appellate court is not obligated to supplement a deficient statement of grounds ex officio.

Legislator headnote

Official

§§ 216 und 249 ZPO; Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR. Der in arbeitsrechtlichen Streitigkeiten geltende Untersuchungsgrundsatz entbindet die appellierende Partei nicht von ihrer prozessualen Verpflichtung, das ergriffene Rechtsmittel zu begründen, d.h. im Einzelnen darzulegen, in welchen Punkten und aus welchen Gründen sie das angefochtene Urteil beanstandet. Der Untersuchungsgrundsatz gemäss Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR kann im Rechtsmittelverfahren durch kantonales Prozessrecht, insbesondere durch ein Novenverbot eingeschränkt werden. | Zivilprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
matter in dispute procedural duty late procedural objections appealability of remand decision prohibition of employment statement of reasons

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR
This provision is cited in the context of the investigation principle in labor law disputes, which does not exempt the appealing party from the duty to substantiate the appeal.
Art. 343 OR
Leitsatz: · §§ 216 und 249 ZPO; Art. 343 Abs.
§§ 216 und 249 ZPO
These provisions are cited in relation to the inadmissibility of further submissions and the scope of the investigation principle in appellate proceedings.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 107 II 237
BGE 100 Ia 119
Deputy Agent v. General Agent (Contractual Party Dispute)
AI generated
OG 1995 39
Inadmissibility of Late Evidentiary Submissions in Appeals
11 97 21 245
Appellant v. Respondent Regarding Duty to Advise on Witness Testimony Objections
11 97 23 242
Appeal on Procedural Prohibition of New Evidence in Nullity Proceedings
V 97 265
Construction Objection Untimely Filed Appeal Affirmed
V 04 38
Procedural Requirements for Stating and Substantiating Administrative Appeals

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§§ 216 und 249 ZPO

These provisions are cited in relation to the inadmissibility of further submissions and the scope of the investigation principle in appellate proceedings.

Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR

This provision is cited in the context of the investigation principle in labor law disputes, which does not exempt the appealing party from the duty to substantiate the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 27.01.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 02 70

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 41

Leitsatz: · §§ 216 und 249 ZPO; Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR. Der in arbeitsrechtlichen Streitigkeiten geltende Untersuchungsgrundsatz entbindet die appellierende Partei nicht von ihrer prozessualen Verpflichtung, das ergriffene Rechtsmittel zu begründen, d.h. im Einzelnen darzulegen, in welchen Punkten und aus welchen Gründen sie das angefochtene Urteil beanstandet. Der Untersuchungsgrundsatz gemäss Art. 343 Abs. 4 OR kann im Rechtsmittelverfahren durch kantonales Prozessrecht, insbesondere durch ein Novenverbot eingeschränkt werden.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.