Wage Underpayment Penalty Reduction in Collective Bargaining Dispute
Legislator summary
AI generatedIn a dispute concerning the construction industry's collective bargaining agreement (LMV), an administrative review board imposed a contractual penalty on an employer for failing to pay the correct base wages to three employees, amounting to an underpayment of CHF 23,577.05, though the employer promptly corrected the arrears and argued the failure was unintentional. The lower court reduced the initially imposed penalty, and upon appeal, the higher court upheld the reduction, reasoning that the board's standard practice of setting the penalty at one-third of the withheld payments was insufficient as it failed to adequately weigh all specified mitigating and aggravating factors on a case-by-case basis, such as the employer's prompt rectification, the minor nature of the remaining issues, and the fact that it was a small family business, justifying the lower penalty amount to still serve the penalty's preventive purpose.
Legislator headnote
OfficialArt. 356 OR; Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV. Landesmantelvertrag für das Bauhauptgewerbe. Bemessung der Konventionalstrafe bei Verletzung gesamtarbeitsvertraglicher Bestimmungen. Eine ständige Praxis, die Konventionalstrafe in Höhe eines Drittels der vorenthaltenen geldwerten Leistungen festzusetzen, wird dem Einzelfall nicht gerecht. | OR (Obligationenrecht)
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedThis provision is cited in the decision summary and appears in the body text, indicating it is part of the legal framework for the dispute, although the dispositive orders themselves are missing specific article citations beyond the general mention.
This provision, governing the criteria for setting the contractual penalty, is explicitly cited in the leading part of the decision, justifying the court's reasoning on the penalty calculation.
Full text
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · I. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)
Entscheiddatum: · 02.12.2003
Fallnummer: · 11 02 101
LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 25
Leitsatz: · Art. 356 OR; Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV. Landesmantelvertrag für das Bauhauptgewerbe. Bemessung der Konventionalstrafe bei Verletzung gesamtarbeitsvertraglicher Bestimmungen. Eine ständige Praxis, die Konventionalstrafe in Höhe eines Drittels der vorenthaltenen geldwerten Leistungen festzusetzen, wird dem Einzelfall nicht gerecht.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.