Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 02 101 • KG LU 11 02 101 AI generated

Wage Underpayment Penalty Reduction in Collective Bargaining Dispute

Case Number 11 02 101
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a dispute concerning the construction industry's collective bargaining agreement (LMV), an administrative review board imposed a contractual penalty on an employer for failing to pay the correct base wages to three employees, amounting to an underpayment of CHF 23,577.05, though the employer promptly corrected the arrears and argued the failure was unintentional. The lower court reduced the initially imposed penalty, and upon appeal, the higher court upheld the reduction, reasoning that the board's standard practice of setting the penalty at one-third of the withheld payments was insufficient as it failed to adequately weigh all specified mitigating and aggravating factors on a case-by-case basis, such as the employer's prompt rectification, the minor nature of the remaining issues, and the fact that it was a small family business, justifying the lower penalty amount to still serve the penalty's preventive purpose.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 356 OR; Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV. Landesmantelvertrag für das Bauhauptgewerbe. Bemessung der Konventionalstrafe bei Verletzung gesamtarbeitsvertraglicher Bestimmungen. Eine ständige Praxis, die Konventionalstrafe in Höhe eines Drittels der vorenthaltenen geldwerten Leistungen festzusetzen, wird dem Einzelfall nicht gerecht. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
collective bargaining mitigating factors contractual penalty clause factoring agreement minimum wage wage deduction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 356 OR
This provision is cited in the decision summary and appears in the body text, indicating it is part of the legal framework for the dispute, although the dispositive orders themselves are missing specific article citations beyond the general mention.
Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV
This provision, governing the criteria for setting the contractual penalty, is explicitly cited in the leading part of the decision, justifying the court's reasoning on the penalty calculation.
Art. 79 Abs. 2 lit. b LMV
Art. 79 Abs. 3 lit. a-f LMV

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 356 OR

This provision is cited in the decision summary and appears in the body text, indicating it is part of the legal framework for the dispute, although the dispositive orders themselves are missing specific article citations beyond the general mention.

Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV

This provision, governing the criteria for setting the contractual penalty, is explicitly cited in the leading part of the decision, justifying the court's reasoning on the penalty calculation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 02.12.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 02 101

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 25

Leitsatz: · Art. 356 OR; Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV. Landesmantelvertrag für das Bauhauptgewerbe. Bemessung der Konventionalstrafe bei Verletzung gesamtarbeitsvertraglicher Bestimmungen. Eine ständige Praxis, die Konventionalstrafe in Höhe eines Drittels der vorenthaltenen geldwerten Leistungen festzusetzen, wird dem Einzelfall nicht gerecht.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.