Legislator Case Law & Legislation
11 01 30 • KG LU 11 01 30 AI generated

Loan Receivable Set-Off Against Rent Claims: Maturity Requirements for Compensation

Case Number 11 01 30
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a dispute concerning the set-off of a loan receivable against rent claims, the court addressed the requirements for valid compensation under the law of obligations, specifically regarding the maturity of the mutual obligations. The key finding was that for a valid set-off, only the claim being used for set-off (the counterclaim, here the loan repayment) must be due, while the primary claim against which set-off is declared (here, the rent claims) only needs to be fulfillable at the time the declaration of set-off is received by the counterparty. Because the fixed monthly rent payments were only fulfillable up to and including the current month when the set-off declaration arrived, the totality of the rent claims was not yet fulfillable, thereby limiting the permissible scope of the set-off at that moment.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 120 ff. und 257c OR. Verrechnung einer Darlehensforderung mit Mietzinsen. Fällig muss nur die Verrechnungsforderung sein. Bei der Hauptforderung genügt die Erfüllbarkeit. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Keywords

AI generated
payment of rent set-off of claims counterclaim law of obligations maturity repayment of short-time compensation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 120 ff. OR

Cited in the summary concerning the general requirements for set-off, although the reasoning on its specific application relates to which claim must be due.

Art. 257c OR

Cited in the summary concerning the nature of the rent claim and its fulfillability in the context of set-off.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 01.05.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 01 30

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 21

Leitsatz: · Art. 120 ff. und 257c OR. Verrechnung einer Darlehensforderung mit Mietzinsen. Fällig muss nur die Verrechnungsforderung sein. Bei der Hauptforderung genügt die Erfüllbarkeit.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.